What is an addback?

I have to admit, when I first heard this term, I had a picture of a redback spider in my head. Needless to say, I wasn’t too fond of the word at first.

But once I got my head around it, boy did it open my eyes. It’s an essential part of understanding the true profitability of a business.

… so what is an addback?

An addback is an unusual or non-business expense that is taken out of the profit & loss statement. This lifts up the business’ net profit to its true operational profitability for prospective business buyers.

But should we be fudging the financial statements?

As part of an accountant’s job to help businesses minimise their taxes, they can apply expenses like interest on a business loan to their business. This reduces the net profit of the business, which in turn reduces the tax the owner has to pay on their income.

Another example is depreciation. Like the above, depreciation can be claimed as an expense, which reduces the net profit of the business (and thus the tax the owner has to pay).

So what’s the significance? Depreciation and interest on a business loan do not affect the actual running of the business, and so shouldn’t be used to determine the true profitability of the business.

OK, so why is it called an ADDback? Isn’t it about taking out expenses?

OK, this part gets a little into accounting-speak, so if you don’t understand what I mean, let me know below and I’ll explain.

This is what a typical P&L (profit & loss statement) looks like.

Sales $a
– COGS $b
Gross Profit ($a – $b) = $c
– Expenses $d
Net Profit ($c – $d) = $e

Now, that’s all fine and good, but when you want to lift the profitability of a business to its maintainable net profit (i.e. with addbacks included), you include what’s called an addback schedule.

The addback schedule contains a list of addbacks to ADD back onto the net profit. What it essentially does is reverse those expense items so you get a better appreciation of the maintainable net profit of the business.

So it looks like this now:

Sales $a
– COGS $b
Gross Profit ($a – $b) = $c
– Expenses $d
Net Profit ($c – $d) = $e
+ Addbacks $f
Maintainable Net Profit ($e + $f) = $g

Hope that explains it. If you don’t get it, leave a comment below and I’ll get back to you.

Otherwise, if you have any other questions about buying or selling a business, please let me know in the comments.

Chris Khoo
Business Broker

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

Related posts:

  1. What is a Trial?
  2. What’s Your Salon Worth?
  3. What Is SAV?
  4. Financing a Franchise – Part 2 of 3
  5. Let’s Start a Business
  • grantwong
    Hey Chris

    You are definitely getting some interesting content on this blog. It is a pleasure to read.

    I thought I'd add that "maintenable net profit" is most commonly simply the EBITDA (earnings before interest tax, depreciation and amortisation) line, adjusted for any one-off revenue or expense items. This earnings figure is a generally a better representation of the maintainable operating cash earnings of a business then net profit after tax as it takes out
    1. the impact of one-off events (like asset write-downs, proceeds from sale assets...etc),
    2. non-cash items like depreciation and amortisation that also differ depending on what accounting standards are applied
    3. the impact of financing decisions (how much debt funding is used and on what terms) as this is not related to the operational performance of the business, and
    4. tax components, which again don't reflect the operational performance of the business but rather how smart your tax advisor is
    Chris, I don't know what context maintainable earnings are used in business broking, but I'd imagine it would be useful when comparing one business to another, as it strips businesses down to its bare operational earnings without the distortions of one-offs, varying accounting or tax treatments and financial management abilities. Is this the way you usually apply it in your dealings as a broker?
  • Hi Grant

    Thanks for the feedback. And yes, EBITDA is the same as maintainable net profit.

    As business brokers, it is our preference for the business' bookkeeper/accountant to do up the addback schedule, but as most small business owners don't like to incur extra costs (understandably!), we can go through it with the client and add back the most obvious non-operational expenses.

    This is probably not going to sound very professional, but honestly, it's quite a fun activity to go through a financial statement and take a business from a 10K loss to 90K profit in a matter of minutes :-).

    Chris
  • grantwong
    Chris, can you please explain why maintainable net profit is important to a prospective buyer? I can understand why depreciation and amortisation would not be too relevant to a buyer as they are non-cash items, but what about tax and interest? Do your clients usually have a view about what tax and debt position can be achieved that may be differ substantially from what the incumbent had been achieving? In other words, is the reason they don't consider the tax and interest payable items because they think these will change when they end up owning the business?
  • Oh, we definitely remove any tax and interest related items... anything that isn't related to the operational side of the business shouldn't be counted in the maintainable net profit.

    Chris
  • grantwong
    Thanks for the reply Chris. I understand that maintenable net profit would not include any tax and interest, however my question was more around if you could explain what are the practical reasons for this. Notwithstanding the fact they are are not "operational" expenses, if I were a business owner these are still relevent cash items that affect my final net cashflows. What I can suppose is the reason for this is that when looking at more than one business, maintenable earnings ensure that you are comparing apples with apples. Is this the only reason for using maintainable earnings?
  • Spot on Mr Wong! Each individual would have different treatments for their tax and interest, hence it'd be unwieldy if an individual comparing businesses has to take out all those factors affecting personal circumstances.

    Chris
blog comments powered by Disqus